150 Years after On The Origin Of Species
Posted by stephmee on May 4, 2009
It’s already 150 years after On The Origin Of Species
This year marks the 150th years of the release of Charles Darwin’s On The Origin Of Species. I find it surprising until now that although many claimed that they believed in evolution or Darwinism, there wasn’t much ‘celebration’ for marking the 150th year of the release of the book. Why not many scientists or schools or universities make this a major event?
Strictly speaking, to put the book back to its original space as a science record observed and written by Charles Darwin himself, it was a record presented at its best with the best known knowledge and the best known equipment, or should I say, none then. Fortunate or unfortunate, observations are never able to tell the whole picture or the whole truth. Science is not a subject that relies solely on observations but the abilitiy to reproduce the same observation with the same conditions (ability to duplicate it), producing the same results.
Unfortunately, this wasn’t so for Charles’ case. He drew conclusions based on his observations (admire that researcher’s spirit) but without the equipment which have been invented over the last 150 years: from microscope to electron microscope etc, Charles didn’t realise that the conclusions he had made could gave such an impact to the world, creating controversy and misfortunes of wrongfully used by evil people to perform destruction of a race as a justification. In fact, in the information age, we learned one thing which is very important, information needs to be verified and with the best means we could.
With better means, we are able to gather more information and most importantly, more accurate information. The invention of microscope and later on the electron microscope open a whole new world to us into the micro-levels of biology that never people have seen before. With the knowledge of genetics and its mechanism, we were shocked too and finally realised that we are all being determined how we will look like, grow like etc… inside our genes. And though we share a lot the same in genes with what we supposed to evolve from, the tiny % differences have already decided we are going to be human and not animals.
Is evolution still a hypothesis or theory?
Yes, it is still a theory. Strictly by definition of science, anything that cannot be proven repetitively, is not science at all. To draw conclusion by observations is always a dangerous thing. Many issues in life happened because of mere observations, plus some assumptions, it can split a family, destroy a relationship, even countries go into battle.
However, to deny evolution is a science would mean, to some people, to accept creation as the alternative possibilities. Actually, to be fair, through observations, you can draw two conclusions: created or evolved. But to accept the possibilities of creation to some would mean to accept the existence of God and thus God’s authorities, rules, purposes etc.. that come along with it.
Thus, there are many who don’t believe in creation not because of non-scientific at all but because of the unacceptance of a higher character called God.
Evolution was to some, a cool thing to believe in because, it means that you decide your own fate, where you want to go (evolve into). Including breaking the norms, hopefully not the rules, or even civil laws.
Believing in Creation is not non-scientific
When you look at a watch, electronic or mechanical, you could tell straight away that it was first being designed and then machined and then put together. Try doing this: put some gears, needles, screws, face dial etc and start shaking them inside a container. May be in gazillion years later, it will become a watch (serving the purpose)?
When a man die, he only turns into dust. We all know what human is made up of: mostly water which is hydrogen and oxygen, then follow by carbon, with some iron, cobalt, other various minerals. We can find the exact proportion and put all these ingredients together. But we can never create a human out of it.
Here leads to also another interesting thing: how is fossil being preserved?
Is fossils really millions of years old?
Many times when a fossil or a group of it was found, it was always mentioned that it was backdated to millions of years. Why? Well, the reason or sometimes could be the motive was because to support the theory of evolution. It took times for creatures to be evolved.
However, say if you live million years ago and you die one day. You were buried or may be even not. Could you believe that you had the chance to become fossils?
Scientists don’t explain in depth how come fossils can be preserved so well over million of years when we know that if we left a dead body unburied, it would decomposed very quickly and over years, not even the skeleton could be left intact.
Only possibility was a sudden event that trapped the dinosaurs, the eggs, the creatures and killed them instantly and thus preserved them until today. Well, you figure it out yourself.
Posted in Christian walk | Tagged: charles darwin, creation, darwinism, evolution, fossil | 1 Comment »












